Why this is not a Movement

“[The Emerging Church] was a wide set of phenomena, too wide to be called a movement. . . . Those who have been characterized as [Emergent] did not come from the same place, and they were not going to the same place. They had in common only one or two practices that put them in the same place in the eyes of critics within the establishment. There is no point in saying that one of these groups was legitimately [Emergent] and another was not, because we have no other criterion with which to define the legitimacy of [one's Emergence].”

John Howard Yoder, Christian Attitudes to War, Peace, and Revolution, [speaking on Anabaptism]
// Remixed by David Wierzbicki

This entry was posted in Reading, Thoughts. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Note: This post is over 8 months old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

  • Friends and Inspirers